So, Californication is ending by Alice Hawke

When I heard that Californication had been renewed for a 7th season when the 6th season had barely started airing, I was elated. Today, on hearing that the 7th season will be the last, I'm... not 'distraught', but disappointed. I can only hope that it ends on a high.

When it was announced that Weeds was going to have its final season, the show had already got out of hand in a crazy manner, and the final episode was bizarre to say the least. Californication started going down the same route when it too messed with time and skipped forward. I enjoyed Weeds, but it didn't end particularly well, leaving a slightly bitter memory rather than the memory of the earlier, better, seasons. Californication has already turned away some viewers with a fair few mildly unrealistic twists and turns, so I can only hope that in the seventh and final season each episode is valued by the writers, and that Hank returns to the career vein of the earlier seasons rather than that of the fifth and sixth seasons. Here's hoping...

The new fall TV shows of 2013 that I'm watching by Alice Hawke

The standard spate of new TV shows hit a few months ago, so I'm going to detail what I'm watching, enjoying, disliking, and looking forward to. Click the show titles go to their trakt pages, which each have links for their IMDB, TVDB, and Wikipedia pages. These are just my opinions, not facts, so make of it what you will. After all, the blog is titled "my thoughts" - that's all it is.

Back in the Game

  • What's it about? A single mother coaching Little League baseball, her son, and her father.
  • Where? ABC
  • Alive? Cancelled, but they're running the original episode order (of 10)

Putting the future of Psych at risk because of Maggie Lawson's new commitment in this, at least we can hope Psych is standing on stronger ground after the cancellation of BitG. Also starring James Caan of Thief fame. It's not bad, but it's not good. I'm a fan of baseball and Lawson, so was drawn to this show but I've been disappointed with the sport being sidelined, episode plots being standalone, and the unbelievably annoying teammates of Lawson's character's son.

  • Did I want it to continue? Not particularly. It was a harmless show, I'm apathetic about it.

Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.

  • What's it about? Agent Coulson's team of operatives traversing the globe in a rather large VTOL jet.
  • Where? ABC
  • Alive? Yes, 22 episode 1st season order

I've watched all the Avengers universe films apart from two Thor films, so I mostly understand all the allusions and references. Other than the pilot and retaining the EP credit, Joss Whedon seems to have mostly handed the helm to his brother Jed.

  • Do I want it to continue? What with the Marvel affiliation I doubt it'll get cancelled, but it desperately needs more engaging plots. I'm apathetic towards it so far.

Brooklyn Nine-Nine

  • What's it about? A dramedy set in a police precinct.
  • Where? FOX
  • Alive? Yes, 22 episode 1st season order

I almost missed that this was on and I'm glad I spotted. Andy Samberg of SNL and Lonely Island fame plays a detective at Brooklyn's 99th precinct (as the title alludes). This is one of the shows I look forward to on a  weekly basis - you get to know the characters quickly and their antics provide that type of humor that really appeals to me.

  • Do I want it to continue? I hope this gets renewed for at the very least a 2nd season - it doesn't look like it costs too much to produce but it's funny and engaging.

Almost Human

  • What's it about? A cop duo in the future.
  • Where? FOX
  • Alive? Yes, but no commitment beyond 6 episodes as still fresh

My most anticipated new sci-fi show, I was frustrated when it got pushed back. After Michael Ealy's role on the criminally short-lived Common Law, I wanted to see him back on TV in more than just guest roles and Almost Human delivers, despite the rather ambiguous (yet meaningful) title. I enjoyed Karl Urban in the two Star Trek films, so anticipated this futuristic buddy-cop drama to be nothing other than a winning combination - and for the most part, it is. Episodes start with a recap of what was established in the first episode, in an unfortunately underwhelming and clichéd manner. The actual show on the other hand, delivers. The chemistry is good, the writers have created enough sub-plot elements to last a while and develop key characters, and Ford seems to be the only car manufacturer in the future. Flippancy aside, if you want to watch a procedural cop drama set in the year 2048 with plenty of possible future expansion, this show is for you.

  • Do I want it to continue? Again, I hope this gets renewed. However, it likely costs a lot more than Brooklyn Nine Nine to produce, but hopefully FOX will see it as financially viable enough to renew.

The Michael J. Fox Show

  • What's it about? A news reporter and his family.
  • Where? NBC
  • Alive? Yes

One of the many new sitcoms. It feels awkward to watch and with such a large family unit, they haven't quite got the same winning character focus balance as Modern Family has, in that each episode seems to be split into equal amounts of plot focus on each character with the closing moral message recap trope. I doubt it'll get cancelled though, as anyone who would axe it will be vilified by the press.

  • Do I want it to continue? I wouldn't mind if this got cancelled, as it isn't really making any dent, it just exists.

Ground Floor

  • What's it about? A guy from the top floor sleeps with a girl from the ground floor - that's pretty much the whole plot.
  • Where? TBS
  • Alive? Yes, 10 episode series order

Unbelievably unfunny. There's not really much to comment on as it makes such little impact. Canned laughter and no redeemable characters.

  • Do I want it to continue? If this lives past ten episodes, there's clearly a glitch in the matrix.

Trophy Wife

  • What's it about? An extended family created from two divorces.
  • Where? ABC
  • Alive? Yes, 22 episode 1st season order

By far my favorite new sitcom. The better of the two new shows to feature West Wing alumni. The change in cast for the daughter after the pilot shook up her character a bit, but after a total of 8 episodes so far I think it's settled back down.

  • Do I want it to continue? I want to see this show become the next Modern Family. It's not quite as smart, but I look forward to each and every episode.

Mom

  • What's it about? A single mother, her daughter, her son, and her mother.
  • Where? CBS
  • Alive? Yes, 22 episode 1st season order

Absolutely dire. I gave it a shot as I liked Allison Janney in The West Wing and Primary Colors, but even she can't save this show.  I laugh at most three times per episode. Where the Michael J. Fox show is awkward to watch, this is simply painful to watch. CBS probably gave it a shot because of Chuck Lorre's previous success with The Big Bang Theory and Two and a Half Men, but this just exemplifies that not everything someone creates will be good.

  • Do I want it to continue? A waste of the airwaves, especially considering CBS cancelled such gems as Vegas last year.

Welcome to the Family

  • What's it about? Two families colliding.
  • Where? NBC
  • Alive? Cancelled after the first 3 episodes

It wasn't particularly impactful, but worse shows have been allowed to continue for it, so I feel sorry for the cast and crew.

  • Did I want it to continue? Would've been nice to see more.

The Millers

  • What's it about? A news reporter and his family. Gosh, that sounds familiar...
  • Where? CBS
  • Alive? Yes, 22 episode 1st season order

I'm not a particular fan of Arrested Development, but I liked 30 Rock so I gave Will Arnett's new show a go. He, Jayma Mays, and J.B. Smoove are good, Margo Martindale was great in a drama like Justified (which I highly recommend) but doesn't suit a sitcom, and I've never found Beau Bridges suited to comedies, just irritating. If the laughter is canned, and it very much sounds like it is, I wish they'd remove it. In some shows, the canned laughter covers up how dire a show is. In shows like this, which are moderately funny in their own right, the canned laughter makes me regret laughing when I do - not a good thing.

  • Do I want it to continue? It has scope for improvement, but they'd better polish it quickly.

We Are Men

  • What's it about? Four single men.
  • Where? CBS
  • Alive? Cancelled after just two episodes

I've not watched much of Monk but I appreciate that Tony Shalhoub is a decent actor, I've seen all the Harold and Kumar movies to be able to recognize the talent of Kal Penn, and recognized Jerry O'Connell from Jerry Maguire. The show had potential, but two episodes weren't enough to gather a balanced impression. CBS on the other hand, decided that the ratings for the two episodes were sufficient enough to warrant a swift canceling.

  • Did I want it to continue? I didn't mind it, but two episodes wasn't enough for an good enough impression.

 

So, those are the new shows that I'm watching, but what am I looking forward to? Killer Women and Chicago PD. Why? Mainly because I like some of the cast members from their previous roles - hopefully then they'll be Trophy Wife style good rather than Mom style disappointing.

Amazon, please stop showing reviews for different products by Alice Hawke

Twice now I have bought items on Amazon after reading seemingly positive reviews that actually turned out to be for different versions of the products. I'll detail the two separately:

I owned a pair of JVC HAFX1X since April 2012, but after a year and a half one of the earbuds died (as tends to be the case with earphones). Nonetheless, I'd liked their quality so hopped on Amazon to buy a new pair, and noticed a new version, the JVC HA-FX3X, which on Amazon UK has 5 reviews as of writing this, as opposed to the 2,193 reviews on the original model. Call me skeptical, but I like to read a lot of positive reviews before buying an item as frankly I don't want to deal with the hassle of returning inferior or faulty products. So, I went over to Amazon US (rather than UK), and noticed 1,863 reviews for the newer JVC HA-FX3X. After reading many reviews, I purchased the HA-FX3X over on Amazon UK. Then, I decided to read some more reviews on Amazon US, and noticed on page 2 a one star review that said it was for the HA-FX3X. I thought this odd, as I'd assumed they all were. Then I looked closer at the other reviews, and they turned out to be for the HAFX1X. To conclude, the few reviews that actually were for the HA-FX3X said they're worse than the original model.

Looks an awful lot like there's 941 reviews for the 4TB model, right?

Next up is the 4TB Seagate external HDD, which appears to have 941 reviews and holds 4 1/2 stars, as you can see here:

 

I bought it, because I am in desperate need of backup storage because my 3TB internal drive sounds like it's going to die soon. Hopefully it won't, because after reading reviews that were actually about the 4TB model it seems it'll be a gamble between DOA or dead in two months. But wait, weren't there 941 reviews for the 4TB one? Surely I read the reviews before buying. Yes, I did read the reviews. Sorted by 'most helpful', the majority of the review were positive. This time, I did notice that most weren't actually for the 4TB model, but I hoped there couldn't be much of a difference so went ahead and made the purchase as I needed the emergency backup space ASAP. Turns out there is a difference though. Out of the first hundred, yes, hundred, most helpful reviews, only six were for the 4TB model. Pardon me, but that just doesn't seem right. To make it worse, of the six reviews, two were one star, three were two stars, and two were five stars, with the failings of the HDDs sounding pretty dire and even the most positive reviews complain about an incredibly cheap, noisy, and potentially dangerous power supply.

What I'd like to know, how is this acceptable? On Google, I expect to see adverts and misplaced promotion as I'm not paying them. On Amazon, I'm not only paying them directly for Prime membership (which on a side-note I highly recommend), they're also taking a cut from sales. I accept this, because that's the way they make money. What I don't accept is them misleadingly placing reviews under different products. Yes, there's a tiny search box to the side, which on typing "4TB" came up with 20 reviews. if that's the total number of reviews for the 4TB model, a 2.1% chance of review relevance if fairly abysmal. Sure, Amazon probably want to make it look like products are more popular and reliable than they are, and maybe the manufacturers are asking them to, but you simply can't do that with most, if not all, goods. Two models of earphones are going to have different performance, four different HDD capacities are going to have varying reliability, two types of pen may write completely differently, and two types of boxset for the same TV show have different contents, yet all the reviews are combined so you have no idea which is for which variation.

Welcome by Alice Hawke

Hi. This is just an introductory post to live up the homepage a bit while I decide which posts to post first (and write some of them). What will appear here? Well, on my Apple news blog there were occasions where I wanted to just air my opinions on other topics, but it wasn't the right place. This is. 

Update:

So, I've decided on what will appear on this blog. As the title I originally set of 'My Thoughts', that's exactly what you'll see - I'll be writing my thoughts on films, television, software, the internet, companies, products, news, people, and life.